| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
M2 and M4 of design 011. Ten thousand devices send an order every five
seconds (2,000 a second); the receiver is killed (-9) at about 21 s and
started again at once. With its secrets remembered the node shows no
100 ms step without an order stored, catches up in 0.2 s, spends no more
CPU than before and makes no X25519; 34 orders were sent again, and
every order made was applied once (three rounds; on the SD card the
same, with 0.2 s silent). Without the memo it makes 10,000 X25519, 1.6 s
of CPU. quinn under the same load stops for 1.0 s and catches up after
10.9 s: 10,115 new connections, about 7 s more of the service's CPU and
8 s of the clients'. A first contact takes Pure one round trip and QUIC
two, at 10, 50 and 100 ms of RTT.
run.py --restart and --first-contact make them; the quinn harness gains
a fixed port with a reset key from its key, clients that connect again,
and a drain for M5.
|
|
|
M1 of design 011. A Pure node allows 1,000 to 1,000,000 senders; each
sends one order and, once told it is stored, rests. At rest a link costs
the node 132 bytes (the sender allowed, 73; its number heard, about 60)
and no transport state; with a million the node runs in 139 MB. A quinn
0.11 service holding the same exchange's clients connected at rest costs
38,106 bytes a connection: 289 times as much, past the design's 1/100.
A link at rest takes its next record in 0.56 ms to stored, one X25519 on
the node included; a new QUIC connection takes 1.06 ms and 2.8 times the
receiver's CPU, without storing.
research/experiments/019-idle-links: links.c, many senders written from
serve/link.h's packet format alone (a second implementation), and the
quinn service and clients (quic/, built offline); run.py makes both
measurements.
|
