diff options
| author | eunhhu <[email protected]> | 2026-10-09 15:41:24 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | eunhhu <[email protected]> | 2026-10-09 15:41:24 +0100 |
| commit | f47f0caa14889013436438f2bcb2c482a58e630b (patch) | |
| tree | 788af0fa944d7fe0990f05c741c8f2a8e4574dbf /research/experiments/009-runtime-drafts | |
| parent | 1b7e9055f019ecf957e4cfbd659268149593c7cc (diff) | |
| download | pure-f47f0caa14889013436438f2bcb2c482a58e630b.tar.gz pure-f47f0caa14889013436438f2bcb2c482a58e630b.zip | |
Research 138: the batch executor's stage 5, design 025 made: sums into cells at once in integers (join 116.0 to 110.5 ms, short of 108: what is left is the same cells' memory, read, add and write again), decide's bit found once (BFS 23.2, short of 21.5: the tail's time was its loads more than its instructions), and the batch executor's loops aligned to 64-byte lines (the hot loops' placement had swung knapsack 6% at the same instructions; the lists' loops aligned too cost the bank's queries 1-2% more instructions, so not they); against b9 matmul -36%, knapsack -28%, roots -7.6%, join -6.2%, BFS -3.9%, the executor alone, the bank queries and TPC-C (+0.7%) as they were; 025's bars and what each stage measured; 024 and CHECKPOINT say so
Diffstat (limited to 'research/experiments/009-runtime-drafts')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
