Say how review 004's seven defects went (103)

Three broke what data means (a walk's range missed the indices an insert
moves; an uncertain save of numbers alone let the next save through; an
output whose fields swapped names kept its waiting sends), four were
errors (a stateless timer never ticked, Vega's terminal lost a key cut
across reads, an input named edit forced documents, timers waited on the
wall clock). Each is fixed with a check that fails on the code before
and passes now, in Pure's and Vega's make check. The review's other
advice (a whole app's memory budget, one real app grown, comparisons with
their conditions set first) is what comes next.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions