| |
|
|
| |
2.19x against 4x, its premise wrong (the source already keeps t.cls[i] in locals: the reads only the proof merges are 16.4 of 549.9), (b) 1.31x against 3x, and the path capped (interpretation is 22 of an instruction's 74 machine instructions: stitching bodies gives at most 1.42x); what was tested (step() on constant instructions, frame and checks as they are) and what was not (an emitter given the proof, the general JIT 008 forbids); where it goes (runtime machinery: a call 1,375, a stored read 331, the lists 22,651 a point) and the 7x the batch lanes give that a fn in a block loses; the 1,774 and 3.2-3.9 ns corrected (the budget's count: 549.9 run, 11.7 ns each) here and in 140; the op counts kept
|
|
|
the numbers: (a) the executor runs 549.9 instructions a code point (the budget's 1,774 counts blocks as written), moves 205.5, constants 76.7 and reads of the same list, version, field and place in an event 16.4, so merging leaves 251.3: 2.19x, the bar 4x (ops-count.patch); (b) the executor's own steps stitched on constant instructions, a function a basic block (stitch.c, native-hook.patch), answers checked: 40,703 to 28,601 machine instructions a point, 15,566 to 11,850 cycles: 1.31x, the bar 3x (cost.c); Vega's C 220 and 82; where it goes: dispatch 22 machine instructions an instruction of 74, an empty handler 1,583 a point, the lists built 22,651 more, the Text record 2,951, decide 12,988 (events.c, variants); a stored list's read 331, a block fn's call 1,375, an arithmetic step 248 in the executor and 35 in batches (unit.c, units)
|
