| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Say what 109 inferred and what it did not measure | eunhhu | 2026-09-30 | 1 | -1/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | Say that prefetching items did not pay, and why (109) | eunhhu | 2026-09-30 | 1 | -0/+57 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Fetching a found item's cells, a leaf's keys and each level's keys ahead made finding and reading items 20% faster on 100,000 items in a micro benchmark, but TPC-C's clean pairs moved 1% at most and finding alone got 48% slower, so it is not in. The owner's finding samples were the descent, not the fields: a write right after a read copies the leaf whole anyway, and what costs is walking structures larger than the caches at random. | ||||
| * | Say what finding items should gain, before measuring it (109) | eunhhu | 2026-09-30 | 1 | -0/+34 |
