aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/research/103-review-004-defects.md
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Say how review 004's seven defects went (103)eunhhu2026-09-291-0/+61
Three broke what data means (a walk's range missed the indices an insert moves; an uncertain save of numbers alone let the next save through; an output whose fields swapped names kept its waiting sends), four were errors (a stateless timer never ticked, Vega's terminal lost a key cut across reads, an input named edit forced documents, timers waited on the wall clock). Each is fixed with a check that fails on the code before and passes now, in Pure's and Vega's make check. The review's other advice (a whole app's memory budget, one real app grown, comparisons with their conditions set first) is what comes next.