| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
(app.c's BORDER: rows whole and finite, the budget and memory begun again, the one state the handler changes written apart and made the state's at a faultless end into a buffer no reader holds, events and changes counted; every end answers all 18,672 lines, the broken-rule build refused at both hand ends): machine instructions a code point, the runtime 40,365, its empty handler 1,595, the hand border with shared 592 and with plain 379, Vega's C given the same payload 240: 68x, 2.5x C (cycles 3.2x), the border 1,595 to about 22; what went: the rows rebuilt into a tree each message (pure_list_read's make_tree), 54 states walked five times an event (40 of them t.X's registers), the last event's nested lists, a bytes state set whole through a text's piece tree; no new fact (N2, today's proof, the language, forms chosen)
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIST_VALUE) and one analysis widened (N2 the handler's changes), not three new as 7ffb114 says: the 9.43x of the event's lists as typed buffers needs no new fact (keyed and indexed are declared, an event's list is one by its place; a typed buffer does every operation an unkeyed, unindexed one gets), only the form chosen and the memory charge's contract; seven fns (range and six), not six
|
| |
|
|
| |
machine instructions a point (event aside) to 564 emitted by hand, 2.5x Vega's C (225; cycles 3.6x), factors 1.46 (dispatch), 3.02 (memory slots and calls), 1.10 (whole numbers), 1.22 (ranges flat), 9.43 (the event's lists typed buffers), 1.23 (Text sharing), the contract left (bounds 1.12, budget and memory 1.39) and the algorithm (1.61); the facts: today's proof licenses exact (each fn's registers, lists and changes: none of the six has lists or changes), then three new (N1 whole numbers, N3 a let list's operations, N4 unchanged after LIST_VALUE) and one analysis widened (N2 the handler's changes); the event itself now the largest layer (1,566 a point: the points decoded into a list, lists cleared and freed, malloc, breaks through the store tree), outside this chain; a premise corrected (the event's lists are FLAT arrays since 021, not trees: the 9.43x is the generic list path); the let lists' factor, broken by a share before, measured as the chain's largest
|
| |
|
|
| |
executor 14,488 machine instructions a point, stitched 8,144, emitted exact 2,474, with integers 1,587, a flat column 1,083, both 226, C 129 (dispatch 1.78x, memory slots and the call's machinery 3.29x, the numbers' and lists' form 10.9x, bounds and budget 1.75x C); the bar set before (3x C's round) missed by exact (217) and passed by both (19.8); the premises checked: an unchanged list proven (function_changes), a whole-number index not (number slots, INDEX_AT checks it: a fact for the proof to take on), a local's lifetime not tested here; "no layer holds most, each 1.4-1.5x" and the let lists' "broken by arithmetic" were shares inside the executor, not factors; "one machine instruction an instruction is 2.5x C" was wrong (both does 269.5 in 226); what is bundled (memory slots with the call), the flat column's cost moved to changes (unmeasured), and 36% of the app only
|
| |
|
|
| |
C's with the test before; now Pure's boundaries are read from its view, and a wrong variant is refused with 0 lines right); the executor and the stitched build, rebuilt at adccf58, both answer all 18,672 lines, and the stitched build's numbers stand (40,189 to 28,089 machine instructions a point, 1.43x; cycles 1.32x); 029 says so
|
| |
|
|
| |
built 17.3%, numbers 13.5%, lists read 13.0%, moves 9.0%, calls 7.1%, malloc 4.0%: no layer holds most of the cliff, three generic ones (interpretation, the lists' form, the numbers') 1.4-1.5x each, the cliff their product; range()'s binary search 36% of the machine instructions and 269.5 of 549.9 executed (an algorithm Vega's C does not use); a candidate broken by arithmetic before code (let lists held again as versioned states: 13,000 of 40,236 at most, 1.5x); the bar's arithmetic (one machine instruction an instruction is still 2.5x C: the instructions must fall too); "the general JIT 008 forbids" corrected (008's task A asks for one execution principle from the proof; it forbids the executors' split and scaled-down techniques)
|
| |
|
|
| |
2.19x against 4x, its premise wrong (the source already keeps t.cls[i] in locals: the reads only the proof merges are 16.4 of 549.9), (b) 1.31x against 3x, and the path capped (interpretation is 22 of an instruction's 74 machine instructions: stitching bodies gives at most 1.42x); what was tested (step() on constant instructions, frame and checks as they are) and what was not (an emitter given the proof, the general JIT 008 forbids); where it goes (runtime machinery: a call 1,375, a stored read 331, the lists 22,651 a point) and the 7x the batch lanes give that a fn in a block loses; the 1,774 and 3.2-3.9 ns corrected (the budget's count: 549.9 run, 11.7 ns each) here and in 140; the op counts kept
|
| |
|
|
| |
rejected by outside feedback 008): two principles, each a layer deleted because another already holds what it holds, each with one experiment that can break it before code; 1 the proof is the compiler (the verifier proves stack places and types, loop bounds, each fn's change set, no aliasing between lists, and the three executors throw it away; a C compiler must guess what Pure has proven, so verified aup should be easier to compile to C's speed than C; delete the executor as a path, the batch lanes and the AArch64 backend, emit by stitching the executor's own op bodies; break it on UAX #14: the merging the proof licenses 4x fewer instructions, no dispatch 3x less a instruction), 2 the commit is the replica (a save's extents self-delimiting and self-verifying, the link's heard their durable ack: no replication layer, the follower's files the leader's byte for byte; break it with two hosts on one Pi, cmp at sampled saves, kill -9 and open as owner; checkpoints and compaction to ship or make deterministic; the owner-choosing rule deferred); schema evolution an open question (one shape in the tree, projected on read: unmeasured, and leaves are columns); effects and screens already one boundary, backends
|
| |
|
|
| |
in a loop's body becomes a branch out of it, unmeasured): ③'s first work settles it
|
|
|
gaps as architecture and order, each hung on an invariant already there (deterministic events, the chained commit log, ordered once delivery, views as pure functions) with a first proof on the Pi, its pass number and a stop rule: 1 the computing cliff and views' fns (the slow specs all runner 2: fns send whole blocks to the executor; fns spread at load below the language, bytes as columns, fewer instructions, CALL in a view whose callees change nothing), 2 the living store's evolution (a migration a pure fn of the new module, rewritten in batches while the app answers; 030's items-wide at 1M under 5 ms unanswered, the store the same bytes), 3 distribution (committed bursts replayed by a follower, an epoch fenced owner chosen by two of three, topology as a directory app's views; two hosts on one Pi first), 4 Vega past the grid (a display list as a view type, layout in aup with text measured by the host, IME and clipboard as input events, native windows last), alongside 5 effects whose results come back as events, one entry, a C ABI v0; the app contract gathered as draft v0, the fixed limits deferred
|
