| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A fold in a table's column runs once per row, over its whole list each
time: per branch, the sum of its accounts read all 100,000 accounts for
every branch, and per rich account, how many are richer read them all for
each of 404 accounts. At load, a planned fold in a column whose test
compares a field of its item with a key the row gives, the rest of it
reading only its list, its item and constants, gets a shape: a group (the
field equals the key) or a rank (a count of items whose field orders
against the key, and nothing else). The app then keeps one pass over the
list per fold and list version: a group pass runs the block a leaf at a
time with the comparison taken as true and the key left out, folding each
item into its field's group; a rank pass radix-sorts the field's values.
A row runs its key alone and looks it up. The pass is made at the second
row that asks, so a fold asked once scans once.
Answers are the fold's own: items join their group in order, so a sum
adds as it would; a key that faults leaves that row to run the fold as
written, and an item that would fault in the pass leaves every row to.
lane_folds now also makes shaped folds (185 groups, 127 ranks, 98 passes
made) and checks them against the same module run item by item.
On the bank of 100,000 accounts: per-branch totals 4.8 ms (16 ms before,
SQLite 46 ms, 14 ms with the index a DBA would add on branch and balance)
and each rich account's rank 6.7 ms (268 ms before, SQLite 2.84 s, 7.6 ms
with an index on balance), HTTP and JSON included on Pure's side. Pure is
given no index.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A fold ran its block once per item through the interpreter, a call and a
lookup of the item each: counting 100,000 accounts took 4.7 ms and a
per-account rank over them 5.3 s. When every instruction of a fold's
block (or a table's filter) has a lane form, as numbers and indexes with
no branch and no text do, the module marks it at load, and the block
then runs for a leaf's items at once: a value is one per item (a leaf's
column read in place, or computed into a row per stack depth), the
items' positions, or one value for all. Lookups by a value for all items
are made once per fold, not per leaf. Leaves are walked with an iterator
that keeps its path (pure_list_next) and fetches the next leaf ahead.
The lanes only take what the interpreter would compute. Where an item
would fault (division by zero, a non-finite result, a key not found, an
index past the end, a clamp the wrong way round, a fractional move), the
whole leaf runs again item by item, so a fold faults, and a filter leaves
the item out, exactly as before; items join the fold in order, so a sum
adds as it did. lane_folds checks it: 300 rounds of random well-typed
folds in views, in a table's columns reading their row and in a handler
storing them, with a random filter, over random lists, answer bit for bit
as the same module run item by item, 920 faults included by kind and
instruction. list_trees now walks runs too.
On the bank of 100,000 accounts (benchmarks/bank/queries.py), against
the same SQL on SQLite 3.46.1: per-branch totals 16 ms (SQLite 46 ms),
accounts in credit 1.1 ms (6.2 ms), large transfers with their accounts
and tellers 0.77 ms (2.1 ms), each rich account's rank 268 ms (2.85 s),
HTTP and JSON included on Pure's side.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OUTER_ROW pushes the row of the column a fold's block runs for, as an
index of the column's list; ROW inside the block stays the fold's own
item. The verifier accepts it only in a fold's block inside a column,
naming that column's list (a fold in a handler, a plain view or a filter
has no outer row). So a column can hold a correlated fold: per branch,
the sum of its accounts; per account, how many are richer. aup compiles
the column's row inside a fold to it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A message for a document scanned the burst's pending keys with strcmp to
see whether its key was there, and the host scanned the burst's earlier
requests the same way before each one: both quadratic in the burst (64
concurrent reads, about 31 compares each, twice). The app now indexes its
pending documents by key (open addressing over an FNV-1a hash, 1 KiB),
answers pure_app_pending in one look, and the host asks it; whether the
current event's document is pending is a flag instead of a scan by
pointer. Bursts split where they did, except that on an owner, which
applies a round's reads first, an edit of a key read in the same round
now splits the burst at the host rather than the app saving on its own.
A unit test checks the index at 200 keys.
|
|
|
The app model, the tree store and the HTTP host lived in
prototypes/connections among the earlier document runtime, the store was
known only by its format's name, and Vega compiled six Pure sources by path.
Now, as the README's principle has it:
core/ runtime, flow and the app model (module*.c), with what the core
asks of storage (state.h, store.h)
store/ the tree store (PURETRE3, PUREREC1)
serve/ pure-serve: HTTP host, outbound delivery, JSON in place
cli/ pure-run, pure-edit-module
A top-level make builds libpure.a (app model and store, for hosts to link)
and the hosts; make check runs the store's and the app model's tests. The
earlier runtime still builds from prototypes/connections against core/ and
store/ (check, check-tree and check-core pass). Design 009 records the rule:
parts by role behind libraries; git repositories split by coupling, so the
store stays here while its contract moves with the core, and Vega stays apart.
|
