aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/core/module.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Keep the numbers heard as a list: a save logs only the ones it changedeunhhu2026-09-281-11/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | The last number heard from each source was written whole into the links value at every save, and counted in two bytes: a node that heard from more than 65,535 sources stored a wrong count, and each save cost as many bytes as there were sources. The numbers are now a runtime-owned list {source, seq} in order of source, stored as a list state is (its image "0heard" and its changes in the log), changed with the event that delivers, so a failed save takes them back with it. Links stored before (PLK1) move their numbers to the list at a start and are stored again without them (PLK2).
* Link two nodes without a connection over UDP (093, design 011's first stage)eunhhu2026-09-281-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pure-serve --send OUTPUT=pure://host:port/INPUT sends an output's saved sends to another node's --link-port with no handshake: the first packet carries records. Keys come from the two nodes' keys (X25519, HKDF-SHA256, AES-128-GCM), with a random run in each packet's header so no nonce repeats across restarts; nothing is stored for them. What lasts is the apps' own: the sender's outbox and the receiver's heard numbers (pure_app_heard, new). The sender detects losses as RFC 9002 says, with NewReno, and trims a send once the receiver says it stored it; the receiver hands the owner whole records in order, which it applies from the one after the source's last heard number, stopping at a gap, and answers how far it stored with every acknowledgment. Stored bytes are the bytes on the wire: an output and an input of one shape need no JSON. server_links_udp kills the receiver, the sender, then both (-9) while four clients buy: every saved order is applied once, with no handshake (five runs, 10k-11k orders each). server_links_udp_lossy does it again in a namespace of its own with the link's packets delayed, lost (3 %) and reordered (10 %) by netem (three runs, 11k-12k orders).
* Keep lists as images and a log of their changes, checkpointed off the ownereunhhu2026-09-281-2/+30
|
* Save a list as its items and a journal of its changes sinceeunhhu2026-09-281-1/+3
|
* Allow 16 records and 128 record fields a moduleeunhhu2026-09-281-1/+1
|
* Slice a keyed list: fold and walk over a range of keyseunhhu2026-09-281-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A fold whose kind has PURE_FOLD_SLICED (128), and a walk whose argument has PURE_EACH_SLICED (bit 0), first take two numbers, a low and a high key, and run for the items of their list (keyed by a number) whose keys are from low up to before high, found by key: the range is the program's meaning, not an optimization, so their blocks may fault (items out of the slice never run). A fold a leaf at a time now leaves out the lanes of a leaf outside the items it runs for, and a leaf that would fault runs item by item over those items alone. Slices are neither shaped nor given automatic ranges. ranges now checks a count over a slice whose test divides (a division by zero failing it only when inside the slice) against a model, the same on the item-by-item path, and a walk over a slice.
* Read only the keys a test allows, and count distinct valueseunhhu2026-09-281-8/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A filter, a fold or a walk's where (a test at the start of its block and a jump to its end when it fails) that ANDs comparisons of a keyed list's key with values reading no item gets a range at load (PureRange: a lower bound GT or GE, an upper LT or LE, EQ both). When it runs, the bounds are found once and looked up by key, and only the leaves between the two positions are read: O(log n + k) where it read every item. A filter leaves the items out of range out anyway, so it always may; a fold or a walk only when the rest of its test and its value cannot fault (no division, sum or product that may overflow, key or item that may be missing), since the items it skips would have run them; a walk's bounds must also read no state, local or list its block writes, as the where reads them anew for every item. A bound that faults leaves the test to run for every item, as written. A fold of kind 5 (distinct) counts the different values its included items give (-0 as 0), with a set per fold; it runs a leaf at a time and is never shaped. max, min and first alone fault over no item. ranges checks, against the same module reading every item, over 60 lists of up to 400 keyed items and 3,600 views: a count between two bounds, a sum between a lower and an upper bound with another condition, first equal to a key, min with the bound on the right, a count whose test may fault (no range), a filtered table in bounds, 359 walks changing and removing the items in bounds, and a walk whose body moves its bound (no range). lane_folds now makes distinct folds too.
* Give an event localseunhhu2026-09-281-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LOCAL_LOAD and LOCAL_STORE name one of an event's 64 slots, what it holds (a number, or an index of a list) and that list: slots start at 0 when an event begins, are shared by its handlers, the walks in them and the folds in those, and are never saved nor in the states' namespace. A handler uses a slot for one thing, so its type is verified as a state's is; views have no locals (IN_LOCALS: a handler's block, a walk in it, a fold in either; stores only in a handler and its walks). A fold reading a local still runs a leaf at a time (one value for every item) and a shaped fold takes one only on its key's side. The signature table's where widens to 16 bits. locals checks a handler that sums items into a local in a walk, counts in a fold the items below it, keeps an index in a local and reads it back, over 80 events against a model, and five refusals. server_rows' shop now takes stock through an index local and counts in one.
* Let a view take argumentseunhhu2026-09-281-3/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An input of the new kind 6 holds the arguments a view takes: fields as a message has, no handler, the view's number where a key input names its key, and the view's name with .args after it; one set a view, never a column's (a table's columns and filter read the table's). The view, its columns and filter, and the folds in them read their arguments with FIELD, verified as a handler reads its message (IN_ARGUMENTS: reads, no reply or document), and a fold anywhere may now read the message or arguments of the block it is in: a handler's count(a in accounts where a.bid == pay.bid) verifies. pure_app_arguments gives a view's arguments as a payload of their shape (placed as a message's fields); the view shows nothing until they are given, and a filtered table keeps its rows for the arguments they were made for. A text argument a view shows stays in the caller's payload (FROM_ARGUMENTS), so it outlives the evaluation. A fold reading a number argument still runs a leaf at a time (the same value for every item), and a shaped fold takes arguments only on its key's side, so its pass does not depend on them. Message fields are placed by one function for messages and arguments. view_arguments checks a keyed lookup by argument, a count above an argument for 43 values against a model, a text argument shown back as it is, a table filtered by an argument whose column folds with it (rows kept per arguments), a handler's fold over its message, and five refusals.
* Walk a list in a handler, and fill a list with a message's rowseunhhu2026-09-281-9/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EACH runs the block that follows in a handler once for every item its list has when it begins, in order, with ROW the item: the block may change states, the list's items (a field, or removing one) and other lists, but may not insert into the list it walks, hold another walk or reply, so a walk runs at most its items times its block. Removing the walked item, or one before it, moves the walk with it, so no item is skipped. A fold in the block reads the walked item as OUTER_ROW, as a fold in a column reads its row. SQL's UPDATE ... WHERE and DELETE ... WHERE are a walk. A message field may now be rows (type 5, naming a list state): records laid out as the list's stored form, filling that list, whose flags hold PURE_LIST_ROWS and whose name is the field's path (order.lines), when the message arrives; rows that are not whole fail it (limit). A list of rows is emptied when every event ends, is never saved, and its changes are not logged for undoing, so a handler walks, folds and counts a message's rows as any list, and may use one as a scratch table within its event. An output has no rows. pure_list_clear lets a list's items go. walks checks a shop against a model over 3,000 random events: orders whose rows each take stock and are logged, all or nothing (997 applied, 1,322 failed and undone, by an item not stocked or not enough of it), and a clean that walks the stock removing items (83 while walking, 32 of them before the walked item). Nine refusals are checked, and 20,000 damaged walk modules run safely with no rows left after any event; all under ASan and UBSan too.
* Answer a fold in a column from one pass over its listeunhhu2026-09-281-3/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A fold in a table's column runs once per row, over its whole list each time: per branch, the sum of its accounts read all 100,000 accounts for every branch, and per rich account, how many are richer read them all for each of 404 accounts. At load, a planned fold in a column whose test compares a field of its item with a key the row gives, the rest of it reading only its list, its item and constants, gets a shape: a group (the field equals the key) or a rank (a count of items whose field orders against the key, and nothing else). The app then keeps one pass over the list per fold and list version: a group pass runs the block a leaf at a time with the comparison taken as true and the key left out, folding each item into its field's group; a rank pass radix-sorts the field's values. A row runs its key alone and looks it up. The pass is made at the second row that asks, so a fold asked once scans once. Answers are the fold's own: items join their group in order, so a sum adds as it would; a key that faults leaves that row to run the fold as written, and an item that would fault in the pass leaves every row to. lane_folds now also makes shaped folds (185 groups, 127 ranks, 98 passes made) and checks them against the same module run item by item. On the bank of 100,000 accounts: per-branch totals 4.8 ms (16 ms before, SQLite 46 ms, 14 ms with the index a DBA would add on branch and balance) and each rich account's rank 6.7 ms (268 ms before, SQLite 2.84 s, 7.6 ms with an index on balance), HTTP and JSON included on Pure's side. Pure is given no index.
* Run folds and filters a leaf of their list at a timeeunhhu2026-09-281-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A fold ran its block once per item through the interpreter, a call and a lookup of the item each: counting 100,000 accounts took 4.7 ms and a per-account rank over them 5.3 s. When every instruction of a fold's block (or a table's filter) has a lane form, as numbers and indexes with no branch and no text do, the module marks it at load, and the block then runs for a leaf's items at once: a value is one per item (a leaf's column read in place, or computed into a row per stack depth), the items' positions, or one value for all. Lookups by a value for all items are made once per fold, not per leaf. Leaves are walked with an iterator that keeps its path (pure_list_next) and fetches the next leaf ahead. The lanes only take what the interpreter would compute. Where an item would fault (division by zero, a non-finite result, a key not found, an index past the end, a clamp the wrong way round, a fractional move), the whole leaf runs again item by item, so a fold faults, and a filter leaves the item out, exactly as before; items join the fold in order, so a sum adds as it did. lane_folds checks it: 300 rounds of random well-typed folds in views, in a table's columns reading their row and in a handler storing them, with a random filter, over random lists, answer bit for bit as the same module run item by item, 920 faults included by kind and instruction. list_trees now walks runs too. On the bank of 100,000 accounts (benchmarks/bank/queries.py), against the same SQL on SQLite 3.46.1: per-branch totals 16 ms (SQLite 46 ms), accounts in credit 1.1 ms (6.2 ms), large transfers with their accounts and tellers 0.77 ms (2.1 ms), each rich account's rank 268 ms (2.85 s), HTTP and JSON included on Pure's side.
* Let a fold that runs in a column read the column's roweunhhu2026-09-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | OUTER_ROW pushes the row of the column a fold's block runs for, as an index of the column's list; ROW inside the block stays the fold's own item. The verifier accepts it only in a fold's block inside a column, naming that column's list (a fold in a handler, a plain view or a filter has no outer row). So a column can hold a correlated fold: per branch, the sum of its accounts; per account, how many are richer. aup compiles the column's row inside a fold to it.
* Find a burst's keys in one lookeunhhu2026-09-271-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A message for a document scanned the burst's pending keys with strcmp to see whether its key was there, and the host scanned the burst's earlier requests the same way before each one: both quadratic in the burst (64 concurrent reads, about 31 compares each, twice). The app now indexes its pending documents by key (open addressing over an FNV-1a hash, 1 KiB), answers pure_app_pending in one look, and the host asks it; whether the current event's document is pending is a flag instead of a scan by pointer. Bursts split where they did, except that on an owner, which applies a round's reads first, an edit of a key read in the same round now splits the burst at the host rather than the app saving on its own. A unit test checks the index at 200 keys.
* Lay Pure out as a core with the parts selected around iteunhhu2026-09-271-0/+343
The app model, the tree store and the HTTP host lived in prototypes/connections among the earlier document runtime, the store was known only by its format's name, and Vega compiled six Pure sources by path. Now, as the README's principle has it: core/ runtime, flow and the app model (module*.c), with what the core asks of storage (state.h, store.h) store/ the tree store (PURETRE3, PUREREC1) serve/ pure-serve: HTTP host, outbound delivery, JSON in place cli/ pure-run, pure-edit-module A top-level make builds libpure.a (app model and store, for hosts to link) and the hosts; make check runs the store's and the app model's tests. The earlier runtime still builds from prototypes/connections against core/ and store/ (check, check-tree and check-core pass). Design 009 records the rule: parts by role behind libraries; git repositories split by coupling, so the store stays here while its contract moves with the core, and Vega stays apart.