| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
rounds it does not run given back where it breaks or gives up), a comparison only a branch reads its flags, a full list's keys read without its bits (a key's position found: its key's register), an add's or sub's register its operand's where that is read last. knapsack 16.5 to 8.5 ms (1.37x C), matmul 25.7 to 22.9
Two bugs the work checks found, there since 6cd7f5a: the outermost loop's round past the work budget gave up at the loop's instruction, with nothing on the stack (the executor opened it again: LIMIT where WORK), now at its iteration; and a phi where an if's ways meet took its merge's loop (-1), so a value made of it was taken as made outside its loop and made once for all rounds. pure-run's budget and work commands; module_tier compares the work and runs four small budgets; module_assumptions keeps both programs
|
| |
|
|
| |
their loop opens (each affine in its round: both ends below the limit), the checks in the round gone; constants in the instructions (add, sub, cmp); one-byte columns widened to four where the tier begins, its loads and stores of four bytes only. roots 14.0 to 14.0 ms, knapsack 38.8 to 16.5, matmul 48.6 to 25.7
|
| |
|
|
| |
values in registers (x20-x28 too, the frame's read again where it ends), whole numbers integers by their facts, the message's fields and lists' columns read once, invariants made before inner loops; where anything does not hold it gives up to the executor at the instruction (pure_run_rest) and the generic code goes on. roots 22.9 to 14.0 ms, knapsack 1,030 to 38.8, matmul 908 to 48.6; module_tier checks random handlers against the executor
|
| |
|
|
| |
knapsack, sort, join, words, matmul, BFS), each against the C one would write, in one process with the same inputs and answers; PURE_AHEAD=0 to measure the code without reading ahead
|
| |
|
|
| |
executor), so their list's columns are there; the keys a list's bits reach none without bits, so one compare asks both; has's rare ways out of the line: a seen edge 14 to 11 instructions, BFS core 8.6 to 7.4 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
well as its first: a node's edges cross a line more often than not. BFS core 12.2 to 8.6 ms, 29.4M to 20.7M cycles, past C's 9.4 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
small constants and powers of two's products in the instruction; where a check may give up, make the result in x16, the operands as they were for the executor (aup's check caught a register shared with its operand): BFS core 12.5 to 12.2 ms, 46.2M to 43.0M instructions (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
items added as its appends make them, the event's headroom, written back before a call, at a fault and as the nest ends: BFS core 14.6 to 12.5 ms, 57.8M to 46.2M instructions (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
(narrow columns, counts, their arithmetic within 2^53), giving up to the executor for the rest of a round when that fails: BFS core 14.9 to 13.4 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
(TPC-C's) runs in the executor, 2.7% faster there (022); PURE_JIT=all compiles every loop for the checks
|
| |
|
|
| |
opens it, read an item and find it in key bits as one, branch back once a round: BFS core 19.6 to 14.9 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
list's keys as its slots), open a packed list's slice in code with an integer index, keep a nest of loops' values in registers of their own: BFS core 27.5 to 19.6 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
| |
on, each loop's columns, key bits and place kept in registers, and appends to an event's list as code: BFS core 55 to 27.5 ms (022)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a frame's fields one by one, and inline group_of (021)
- Compiled code paid only where blocks repeat; a block run once (a view's
cell, a fold's item, most handlers) ran slower through the code's entry
and its calls of step: the bank's table queries took 16-24% more
instructions. Now only a block with an EACH or a LOOP is compiled, and
a module with none keeps no compiled code.
- run() set its whole frame each time (the compiled code's run among it);
now its fields one by one.
- group_of is inlined into its pass: after the executor's refactor it
was a call per row (per_branch +4-5% instructions; now +1.1-1.3%).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
at the finger's leaf, and move indices only for a list an index refers to (021)
- The frame keeps the run compiled code read a tree's item from last (the
list as it was: its version); an item it holds is read from its column,
else pure_run_item takes the item's run and steps.
- pure_list_run starts at the leaf the finger keeps when it holds the
position (a slice found by key just before): no second descent; the
run after it is found from the root (PureRun.pathless).
- LIST_APPEND and LIST_REMOVE move index states only for a list one
refers to.
- A search (core only): 89 ms compiled (answers the executor's).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arithmetic, has by bits, a DENSE field by key, a FLAT item, and loop iterations (021)
- module-jit.c writes CONST, LOAD, STORE, the local and row loads,
INDEX_FIRST, LIST_COUNT, INDEX_MOVE, NOT, NEG, FLOOR, the number
arithmetic and comparisons (DIVIDE and NON_FINITE faults where the
executor gives them), LIST_HAS by a key set's bits, a joined FIND's
field of a DENSE list, a FLAT list's ITEM_GET, and a walk's and a
count's iteration (work charged as the executor charges it). Anything
else, or a list in another form, still calls step.
- module-list.c says where a list keeps what the code reads
(pure_list_layout); list_of and item_field are shared.
- PURE_JIT_DUMP=file writes the code made, to read with objdump.
- A search (core only): 103 ms compiled, 122 ms executed; the answers
(hops, reached, work) are the executor's.
|
|
|
call the same steps (021)
- run() keeps a block's operand stack and open loops in a Frame; step()
runs one instruction (branches and loops too, one dispatch), and
enter_each, enter_loop, leave_loop and iterate are their own functions.
The executor is the same machine code, 7% fewer instructions.
- The verifier records each instruction's stack height (from its block's
start), so compiled code knows each slot's place.
- module-jit.c (AArch64 Linux; elsewhere, or PURE_JIT=0, none): a
module's handlers', views' and folds' blocks compiled when it loads.
Branches and loops are branches; every other instruction calls the
executor's own step, so both run the same meaning. A loop that is not
opened lands where its iteration would have ended; an empty loop
iterates in place.
- test-module recompiles a module whose code a test changes after load.
- A search (100,000 nodes, 1,000,000 edges, core only) is 150 ms
compiled, against 122 ms executed: a call of step for every instruction
costs more than the executor's switch; the hot instructions are written
as code next.
|
