aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/benchmarks/tpcc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Read TPC-C's table dumps from Pure a page at a timeeunhhu2026-09-301-4/+10
| | | | | | | With four warehouses the order lines answered at once (about 140 MB of JSON) outgrew pure-serve's 64 MiB budget, and the check stopped with 503; a larger budget would have left the answer's memory in the resident size measured after.
* Checkpoint TPC-C's SQLite each 40 MB of WAL, as tuning on both devices choseeunhhu2026-09-301-6/+11
| | | | | | Its default, each 1,000 pages, is 1 MB of WAL with the 1 KiB pages the SD card favours: grouped commits there went from 203 to 694 a second, and in RAM a thread's p99 from 1.2 to 0.2 ms (docs/research/106).
* Let TPC-C's SQLite commit in groups as pure-serve does, and say what each ↵eunhhu2026-09-302-50/+276
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | run costs The terminals hand their writing transactions to one writer, which runs those waiting in one transaction, each in a savepoint, and commits them with one sync; reads stay on the terminals' connections, as pure-serve shows views from the last save. An undone New-Order is rolled back by its caller now (it rolled back the whole group before, and counted as failed after the split). Each run reports its CPU a transaction, the owner thread's share of a core, its memory, and the bytes a transaction had written, by the process and to the device. SQLite runs with its database mapped, a 64 MiB cache and savepoint journals in memory unless told otherwise.
* Check TPC-C's consistency from one snapshot a side, and measure TPC-C on RAM ↵eunhhu2026-09-281-19/+22
| | | | and an SD card
* Run TPC-C on Pure and on SQLite, and compare the states they leaveeunhhu2026-09-285-0/+1316